Is XOR Decryption in PlayBASIC as Fast as Assembly?

July 07, 2025

 

Logo

🔍 Is XOR Decryption in PlayBASIC as Fast as Assembly?

Every now and then, a forum question pops up that really catches my attention — and this one did just that. A PlayBASIC user recently asked:

> "Is using XOR decryption when loading media from memory in PlayBASIC as fast as doing it in assembly?"

At first, I was a little puzzled. Why? Because the function in question is written in assembly — it's already doing exactly what the user thought might be a separate optimization path. So, let's unpack what's really going on behind the scenes when you XOR encrypted media in memory using PlayBASIC.


🔐 XOR Media Loading: A Quick Recap

Years ago, PlayBASIC added support for loading media directly from memory. Earlier versions relied on external packer tools to encrypt and wrap media, but these days, you can load and decode encrypted content entirely from within your program.

The basic workflow is:

  1. 1. Load your file into memory.
  2. 2. Call the `XORMemory` function with a key.
  3. 3. The content is decrypted and ready to use.

You can use any XOR key you like. While XOR encryption is relatively simple and easily reversible, it’s still useful for basic protection against casual asset ripping.


🧠 What Happens Internally?

When you call `XORMemory`, PlayBASIC doesn’t interpret the data — it pushes the work down to the engine’s internal rendering system. Specifically, it uses the XOR ink mode inside the `Box` drawing function.

This function writes color data onto a surface by XOR’ing it with the existing pixels. Here’s what makes it cool: that surface isn’t necessarily a visible screen — it's just treated as raw memory.

To decrypt, the engine:

  • Creates a temporary 32-bit image buffer (must be 32-bit to handle raw data correctly).
  • Loads the encrypted file data into that buffer.
  • Applies the XOR key using the `Box` command in XOR mode.
  • Copies the result back to memory.
  • That’s it.


    💥 But Is It Fast?

    Yes. Very fast — because under the hood, this process is powered by raw MMX assembly.

    When the engine detects MMX support, it uses MMX instructions to process 64 bits (two 32-bit pixels) at a time:

  • Data is loaded into MMX registers.
  • XOR is performed at the hardware level.
  • Results are written back immediately.
  • Here’s the inner loop in plain terms:

  • Load two pixels from memory.
  • Load XOR key into a register.
  • XOR them.
  • Write them back.
  • Repeat in a tight loop.
  • We’re talking near cycle-per-pixel speeds here — hardware-level performance. If MMX isn't available, it gracefully falls back to optimized C code. Either way, you're getting a performance-optimized routine.


    🕰 Legacy Notes

    Older machines or systems using 16-bit display modes may encounter issues unless you force a 32-bit surface. That’s why the engine explicitly creates a 32-bit buffer in the decoding routine — it ensures consistent behavior across different environments.

    Also worth noting: drawing directly to the screen (especially in older systems where the screen buffer lives in VRAM) would be very slow due to the read/write overhead. But modern systems (e.g., Windows 10/11) emulate these surfaces in system memory, allowing direct blending without penalty.


    ✅ Final Thoughts

    So, to answer the original question:

    Yes — XOR decryption in PlayBASIC is as fast as it can be. It’s literally done in machine code.

    This is just one example of how PlayBASIC leans on low-level optimizations to make higher-level features accessible and fast. You get the convenience of a BASIC command, but the performance of assembly behind the scenes.


    Got more technical questions?

    Join the conversation on the forums, or check out the help files for more info about ink modes, memory banks, and low-level drawing operations.


    Tags:

    `#PlayBASIC` `#GameDev` `#Encryption` `#Assembly` `#MMX` `#XOR` `#RetroCoding` `#Performance`

    BASIC Isn't Dead. It Just Grew Up.

    June 01, 2025

     

    Logo

    1. BASIC Isn't Dead. It Just Grew Up.

    If you learned to program in the 80s or 90s, chances are your first line of code looked something like this:

    PRINT "Hello, World!"
    

    To many, BASIC feels like a relic of computing’s early days—an outdated teaching tool overshadowed by modern languages like Python or JavaScript. But that assumption couldn't be more wrong. BASIC never disappeared. It diversified. It evolved. And today, it lives on in a wide range of powerful, practical dialects still being used to build games, web tools, business systems, and more.

    2. What Made BASIC Great Then Still Matters Today

    BASIC was designed to be accessible. Its name stands for Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code, and its creators wanted students to focus on learning to solve problems, not memorizing syntax. That simplicity, that clarity, is what makes BASIC surprisingly relevant even now.

    Today's developers value code that is readable, quick to write, and easy to maintain. Sound familiar? That’s the same philosophy behind modern favorites like Python, Lua, and even aspects of Swift. BASIC got there decades earlier.

    3. Visual Basic: The Face Everyone Recognizes

    No conversation about BASIC is complete without mentioning Visual Basic (VB). Introduced by Microsoft in the early 90s, VB turned BASIC into a powerhouse for Windows development. Its visual form designer and event-driven model made it the go-to language for building business applications and internal tools.

    Even today, VB.NET is still supported in Visual Studio, and VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) remains deeply embedded in Microsoft Office, driving automation and macros across the business world.

    But here’s the key point: Visual Basic is just one dialect. BASIC’s legacy didn’t stop with VB—it blossomed into a wide ecosystem of modern tools, many of which continue to be actively developed.

    4. Beyond VB: The Modern BASIC Landscape

    🎮 Game Development

  • PlayBASIC: Designed for 2D game development with beginner-friendly syntax and graphics built-in.
  • BlitzBASIC / Blitz3D / BlitzMax: Known for real-time game development. Still loved by retro game coders.
  • DarkBASIC: Created to simplify 3D game creation on Windows.
  • ⚙️ General Purpose / Desktop

  • PureBASIC: Cross-platform, compiled language with full support for GUIs, DLLs, and multimedia.
  • FreeBASIC: A modern take on QBASIC with low-level access, C-like performance, and inline assembly support.
  • Oxygen BASIC: Lightweight and powerful, compiling directly to machine code.
  • 📱 Mobile and Cross-Platform

  • B4X: Formerly Basic4Android, B4X now targets Android, iOS, and desktop platforms with VB-like syntax.
  • 🌐 Web, Scripting & Automation

  • VBA: Still widely used in Excel and Access to automate reports, calculations, and workflows.
  • BasicAnywhere: A lightweight BASIC interpreter that runs in the browser.
  • 5. BASIC vs. Python: Different Names, Shared Philosophy

    Many developers praise Python for its simplicity, readability, and gentle learning curve. But that exact spirit was BASIC's mission from day one. The syntax and philosophy of BASIC have more in common with Python than most realize:

    REM BASIC
    PRINT "Hello, World!"
    
    # Python
    print("Hello, World!")
    

    Both prioritize clarity over cleverness. Both are great for beginners and prototyping. BASIC simply got there first.

    6. Why BASIC Still Deserves a Place at the Table

    Modern BASICs aren't just toys. They support features you'd expect in any serious language:

  • Compiled executables
  • GUI frameworks
  • Graphics and sound
  • Cross-platform support
  • Integration with system APIs
  • In many cases, these tools are faster to learn and deploy than bloated stacks involving multiple frameworks and languages. That makes BASIC a compelling choice for hobbyists, indie developers, and even small businesses looking for quick, effective solutions.

    7. Final Thoughts: BASIC Isn’t Just Nostalgia—It’s a Toolset That Works

    The myth that BASIC is obsolete is just that—a myth. While it may not dominate headlines, BASIC continues to evolve, empower, and enable. It never stopped being useful. It never stopped being fun.

    If you're a Python fan, or just want to create something without jumping through endless setup hoops, explore modern BASICs. There’s a whole ecosystem waiting for rediscovery.


    Where to Try Modern BASICs:

  • FreeBASIC
  • PureBASIC
  • PlayBASIC
  • B4X
  • QB64
  • BlitzMax NG
  • Oxygen BASIC

  • BASIC didn’t fade away. It just grew up quietly. And it’s still here—faster, friendlier, and more flexible than ever.



    Building a Wolf 3D-Style Engine in PlayBASIC with Affine-Textured Polygons

    March 31, 2025

     

    Logo

    The idea behind this project was simple: Could I recreate a Wolfenstein 3D-style engine in PlayBASIC while maintaining good perspective but using affine texture-mapped polygons instead of traditional raycasting?

    Floors and Ceilings: Subdivision for Perspective

    Classic Wolfenstein 3D engines rely on raycasting, but I wanted to explore using polygons. This introduced two key challenges: rendering walls and handling floors/ceilings. I tackled floors first by subdividing floor tiles near the camera, ensuring that closer surfaces were represented with a denser set of polygons. This approach worked well, maintaining an accurate perspective without excessive computational overhead.

    Walls: Adaptive Subdivision

    I applied the same technique to walls, subdividing them based on their distance from the camera. Surfaces closer to the viewer were represented with more polygons, while those farther away used fewer. This adaptive approach preserved scene perspective while optimizing performance.

    Ensuring Proper Polygon Order

    A major challenge with polygon-based rendering is ensuring proper drawing order. Since walls, floors, and ceilings are drawn as independent polygons, z-fighting (incorrect layering of polygons) can be an issue. To address this, I implemented a two-pass rendering system:

    1. 1. First, floors and ceilings are drawn.
    2. 2. Then, walls are rendered on top.

    This method prevents z-popping artifacts commonly seen in painters’ algorithms and produces a visually appealing scene.


    Enhancing the Classic Wolf 3D Look: Adding Light Mapping

    To push beyond the classic Wolfenstein 3D aesthetic, I added a light mapping pass. Implementing this in PlayBASIC required rendering the scene twice—essentially brute force—but the cost was only around a 20% performance hit. The visual improvement, however, was well worth it.

    The process involved:

    1. 1. Drawing the texture-mapped scene.
    2. 2. Overlaying a Gouraud-shaded version of each triangle, where each pixel’s color was alpha-blended with the background.

    This resulted in a real-time light-mapped scene with a Doom-like atmosphere, enhancing immersion and depth.


    Pushing Further: 3D Polygonal Characters Instead of Sprites

    A long-standing idea I wanted to explore was replacing traditional 2D sprites with 3D polygon-based characters. This concept originated from my work on a rendering engine called "Reality" for Amiga computers back in 1995, which aimed to integrate both sprites and 3D objects within a scene.

    Implementing 3D Objects

    To bring this concept into PlayBASIC’s Wolf 3D engine, I needed a way to load and render 3D models. I chose the DirectX ASCII format due to its simplicity. The loader extracted three key components:

  • Vertex data (point locations)
  • UV data (texture mapping coordinates)
  • Face data (which vertices form polygons)
  • Fortunately, I had already written a PlayBASIC loader for this format years ago. With minor modifications, I incorporated it into the project and built a simple object library for dynamic 3D models within the scene.

    Sorting and Rendering 3D Objects

    Rendering 3D models in a PlayBASIC-based engine required an efficient way to order polygons. Rather than manually sorting faces, I leveraged PlayBASIC’s built-in 2D camera system. Each face was assigned an average depth value (Z-depth), and the engine used the camera’s sorting system to manage rendering order. This approach avoided the need for a costly manual sort, maintaining decent perspective despite the lack of true z-buffering.

    The final result was impressive: a Wolfenstein 3D-inspired environment with fully textured, light-mapped walls and floors—now featuring real 3D characters and objects.


    Future Optimizations: Reducing Overdraw with a Portal System

    One of the biggest challenges in 3D rendering is overdraw—when objects outside the visible scene are still processed and rendered. While the engine is fast enough to handle this, unnecessary rendering wastes performance.

    To optimize, I am experimenting with a portal-based rendering system. This system:

  • Connects open areas (portals) within the game world.
  • Checks which portals are visible from the camera’s current position.
  • Recursively determines visibility, ensuring only necessary polygons are processed.
  • This technique should significantly improve rendering efficiency without sacrificing visual fidelity. However, that’s a topic for a future update!


    Get the PlayBASIC Source Code

    You can download the full PlayBASIC source code for this project from our forums. Stay tuned for more updates as I refine the engine and explore new rendering techniques!

  • Yet Another Wolfenstein 3D Demo (Texture Mapped Floors & Ceiling)